So What is the Western society and its Science's anti-man misinformation agenda

1. To show man's sexual need for men as essentially effeminate, third gender, 'different', unmanly and as the source of man's femininity by nature.

2. To show man's sexual need for women as 'manly' and the source of a man's masculinity and manhood by way of nature (and not arbitrary social engineering).

3. To deny space to and to unacknowledge masculine male sexual desire for men, make it seem as non-existent.

4. To deny space to and to unacknowledge feminine male sexual desire for women, to make it seem as unreal and non-existent.

3. To show that the homo-hetero divide is real. That men who like men are essentially different from men who like women.

5. To give space to and promote female bisexuality as natural and normal.

6. To deny space to male bisexuality and to unacknowledge it as real (since male bisexuality threatens the strict straight-gay divide that the society and science wants to enforce.. 

March 07, 2009

Exposing Michael Bailey as a crooked scientist

This is a document obtained by the moderator of the "Transexual Road map" website, of the leading pursuer of science's anti-man agenda -- M Bailey.

M. Bailey is one guy who has been relentlessly abusing science in order to further all of science's agenda against men, mentioned above. He has 'proved' that 'most effeminate males grow up to be gay', that 'heterosexual transexuals are not real transsexuals', and that "there is no real bisexuality, and the men claiming to be bisexuals are actually gays in hiding.'

Now, when 'scientists' like Bailey forward theories that male desire for men = male femininity, the masculine males who like men are unable to challenge the theory. For the most part, most masculine males who like men (which is nearly all of the straight male population) hide and unacknowledge their sexual need for men, and thus are disempowered to speak up for it. So, these theories go compeletly unchallenged, and in fact are supported by the 'homosexuals' who are actually the third gender who like men, and they fully validate the theory, being the only voice to speak for 'men's sexual desire for men.'

The few masculine males that take up the gay identity and own up their sexuality for men, are in any case not well-informed, and they do not have a space of their own, being dependent on the third gender 'gay' space. Masculine males who like men are not accepted in the straight identity.

However, the feminine 'heterosexuals' were thrown out by the heterosexual or the straight group, since it affects the heterosexuality = masculine image. And they were accepted by the third gender homosexual community, since they naturally share the same gender.  Once they had a space, they could challenge the proposed idea that 'heterosexual' transgendered males are not really feminine.

Here is the said document by Michael Bailey.

"Controversial ideas" by J. Michael Bailey

On 2 April 2003, Joseph Henry Press publicist Robin Pinnel sent out promotional materials for The Man Who Would Be Queen by J. Michael Bailey, including the following attachment.

One of our investigators retrieved this from three attached files mentioned by Pinnel and sent the following analysis:

What's really important about these documents is one was written by Bailey, on his outdated little Mac, on December 3, 2002.

I decoded all three and was able to open them directly in Microsoft Word and see all three authors stats and electronic signatures, as well as see their thinking in their own words before the book went to press.

These docs are very damning, and really show some of the backroom thinking that was going on. JHP and Bailey won't be able to back away from their own words on what they "meant" and what they "intended" when it's all right here in black and white!



[controversial ideas.doc]

The Man Who Would Be Queen
by J. Michael Bailey

This book is controversial. It is about feminine men, from before birth to adulthood, to the rebirth experienced by those who decide to become women. Its three sections include one on very feminine boys, one on gay men, and one on transsexuals. These meld scientific studies with stories about real people.

Male femininity is a phenomenon that most people find interesting but which has been ignored by science due to concerns ranging from social conservatism to sensitivity (or less charitably, political correctness). For example, despite widespread stereotypes that gay men tend to be feminine, research related to the stereotype has only recently been conducted. 

Here are some of the topics and questions the book addresses:

FEMININE BOYS

Do very feminine boys become gay men?

Yes they usually do. As adults, nearly all are attracted to men.

Are feminine boys born or made?

Scientific studies of rare conditions in which boys are changed into girls soon after birth show that even the most extreme social manipulation can’t make a feminine boy. They seem to emerge that way from the womb.

How often do feminine boys become transsexual adults?

Although most feminine boys become gay men rather than transsexuals, a significant minority—perhaps 10%—of very feminine boys will choose to become women.

Do feminine boys need therapy to make them happy and well-adjusted adults?

This is controversial, and participants in the controversy tend to ignore the best points of the other side. On the one hand, treatment that focuses on extinguishing feminine behavior may make the boys masculine at the expense of shame and self-hatred. On the other hand, if we could make society completely accept feminine boys, more of them might choose to change into women.

GAY MEN

Are gay men feminine, like [sic] stereotypes suggest, or are they masculine, like social scientists have asserted for thirty years?

Yes. That is, gay men are a mixture of masculine and feminine traits. In some respects, they are remarkably feminine, but in some others, they are as masculine as straight men.

Gay men do in fact have feminine occupational and recreational interests, and this affects the jobs they choose and the ways they spend their time.

Gay men are also feminine in their speech patterns—there is a “gay voice”—and in their movement.

In some other ways, gay men are just like straight men. These include many aspects of sexual behavior. For example, gay men and straight men both enjoy casual sex—but gay men are able to have much more casual sex, because their partners also enjoy it.

Do some gay men act feminine in order to be accepted by other gay men? Do feminine and masculine gay men pair up as “husband and wife?”

No. Actually, gay men dislike feminine attributes in their romantic partners. Virtually all gay men prefer masculine rather than feminine partners.

Are gay men born or made?

Born. The best evidence for this is the feminine boys who will become gay men. These boys act that way despite, not because of, the social influences that surround them.

Aren’t we all really bisexual, like the ancient Greeks?

No. Men tend to be attracted to either men or women, but not both. Furthermore, the existence of feminine gay men transcends cultures and time.

TRANSSEXUALS

Are transsexuals women trapped in men’s bodies?

No. First of all, there are two very distinct types of males who become females. (Few scientists, much less laypeople, have understood the difference between them.) One of them—the type that likes only men—is naturally feminine in many respects, but not in all. The other is not at all feminine except as the result of effort.

What about men who become women only to be lesbians?

This is the second type of transsexual. They are primarily sexually attracted to the image of themselves as women, but they also are attracted to women.

Are transsexuals born or made?

The feminine transsexual is born feminine. However, whether he elects to become a woman depends on lots of social feedback. For example, will he be more attractive as a man or as a woman? The other, non-feminine, type of transsexual seems to develop his unusual sexual preference (for himself as a woman) without any social input.

Are transsexuals happy once they become women?

For the most part, they are happier than they were as men. However, they still do not lead conventional lives.


See the main page on Robin Pinnel for more materials put out by Joseph Henry Press.

References

Pinnel R. new book on homosexuality, transsexualism and science. via Indymedia.org, 2 April 2003.

http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/public/imc-atlanta-audio/2003-April/000188.html


No comments:

Post a Comment